29 April 2020
The load of the universe (technically the mass of the universe) is a troublesome factor to measure. To do it it’s essential to rely not simply stars and galaxies, however darkish matter, diffuse clouds of mud and even wisps of impartial hydrogen in intergalactic area. Astronomers have tried to weigh the universe for greater than a century, and they’re nonetheless discovering methods to be extra correct.
Understanding the mass of the cosmos is central to understanding its historical past and evolution. Whereas darkish vitality drives the universe to develop, matter tries to maintain the universe from increasing. Collectively they type a median density of matter and vitality within the universe, referred to as the cosmic density parameter. This parameter is central to the usual mannequin of cosmology, also called the ΛCDM mannequin
One solution to measure this parameter is to have a look at the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). This remnant glow from the massive bang has small variations in temperature. The dimensions of those fluctuations tells us the speed of cosmic growth, which in flip lets us know the cosmic matter density.
One other solution to weigh the universe is to have a look at how the sunshine of distant galaxies is deflected by galaxies. It’s an impact referred to as gravitational lensing. The problem with this technique is figuring out which gentle is lensed and which isn’t. To try this we would wish to match the distorted form of the galaxy we see with the precise form of the galaxy, which we don’t know.
It’s not doable to make a comparability for a single galaxy, however we will examine them statistically. Since we all know the form of a median galaxy, we will examine this to the lensed shapes we see to get a statistical measure of how a lot lensing happens. This was the objective of a mission referred to as the “Kilo-Diploma Survey.”
Whereas the lensing impact offers you a statistical measure of the quantity of mass between us and a distant galaxy, it doesn’t provide the cosmic density. For that, it’s essential to know the way far-off the galaxy is. The larger the gap, the extra mass you’d anticipate between it and us. So the workforce additionally decided galactic distances by measuring their redshifts at a number of wavelengths.
The result’s a cosmic density parameter that differs barely from that discovered from the CMB. This isn’t the primary time we’ve seen a unusual disagreement in cosmology. Of their work, the authors speculate that this might point out the usual cosmological mannequin is unsuitable. In the usual mannequin, it’s assumed that the quantity of darkish vitality within the universe is fixed. However this newest knowledge match an alternate mannequin the place darkish vitality adjustments over time.
It’s an attention-grabbing thought, nevertheless it’s a giant bounce. Whereas this newest end result does disagree with CMB knowledge, different comparable research don’t. It’s fairly doable that there’s a systematic bias on this examine. So don’t throw out your previous cosmology textbooks fairly but. In the long run it’s the weight of proof that may decide whether or not the authors of this new examine are proper.